這里是JCS編輯部

歡迎

外刊吃瓜

社會(huì)學(xué)國(guó)際頂刊推薦

Work, Employment and Society

About WES

Work, Employment and Society is a leading international peer-reviewed journal of the British Sociological Association which publishes theoretically informed and original research on the sociology of work.

Work, Employment and Society is an official journal of the British Sociological Association.

Work, Employment and Society

Journal Metrics

Current Issue

Work, Employment and Society為雙月刊，最新一期（Volume 39 Issue 5, October 2025）設(shè)有"PhD Showcases""Articles""On the Front Line""Book Reviews""Obituary"五個(gè)欄目，共計(jì)15篇文章，詳情如下。

CONTENTS

Part 1

PhDShowcase

Precarious Masculinities: Migrant Working Men’s Masculinities as Self-Exploitation in a Mediterranean Restaurant in GlasgowPanos

Theodoropoulos, Sam Lawton-Westerland

Drawing on a covert ethnography of a Mediterranean restaurant in Glasgow, this article analyses how practices characteristic of hegemonic masculinity are incorporated by male migrant workers in the process of crafting labour identities. Building on Connell’s framework of hegemonic masculinity, the researchers found that performances of masculinity operated in a way that, while allowing subjects to feel some degree of power, also ultimately reinforced the individualising pressures promoted by the labour process. It is therefore argued that hegemonic masculinity is critical in providing an avenue through which experiences of exploitation are naturalised by precarious labour workforces.

Is Workplace Flexibility Penalised? The Gendered Consequences of Working from Home for the Wages of Parents and Childless Employees in the UK

Johanna Elisabeth Pauliks

Working from home has been discussed in terms of reconciling work and family life and reducing gender gaps in the labour market. However, its implications for wages remain the subject of debate, with some researchers arguing that flexibility stigma disproportionately disadvantages certain groups, particularly mothers. This article uses data from Understanding Society, the UK Household Longitudinal Study, to investigate whether working from home has different consequences for individual wages according to gender and parental status. Inverse probability weighted fixed-effects regression models are used with a sample of up to 8552 employees. The results suggest that working from home is associated with higher earnings for mothers, suggesting that the benefits of flexible working arrangements may outweigh potential disadvantages.

Part 2

Articles

Internal Borders and the Shaping of Noncitizen Workers in the Context of Ethnonational and Territorial Conflict

Jonathan Preminger

This article explores the role of internal borders in shaping conditions for noncitizen workers in the context of ethnonational and territorial conflict. Based on research in Israel/Palestine and drawing on recent scholarship that problematises essentialist understandings of borders, the article asserts that working conditions are shaped by bordering practices which constrain the activities of social actors and determine the legitimacy of organisations in various enclaves within contested territory. Moreover, borders facilitate the creation of individualised workers separated from other ‘indigenous’ identities and collectives, dividing the ‘legitimate’ worker from the threatening or valueless. The article thus contributes to recent work on the nexus between employment conditions for migrant workers and immigration regimes, arguing that within contested territory, internal borders do not merely facilitate the exploitation of noncitizen workers, but assist the state in managing conflicting logics: inclusion for exploitation and exclusion of unwanted ‘others’ from the ethnonationalist political community.

Mechanisms Underlying the Effects of Work from Home on Careers in the Post-Covid Context

Anna Matysiak, Agnieszka Kasperska, Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska

This study investigates the role of two mechanisms – perceived workers’ performance and commitment – in shaping the career opportunities of teleworkers and office-based workers in the post-pandemic context of the United Kingdom. We outline a theoretical framework that integrates economic and sociological literature on work from home (WFH) and careers, and accounts for workers’ gender and parenthood obligations. We test it utilizing data from a discrete choice experiment conducted between July and December 2022 with 937 managers. Our findings reveal that hybrid workers face poorer career prospects than office-based workers because managers perceive them as underperforming. Among full-time teleworkers, reduced career opportunities stem not only from managers’ perceptions of their job performance but also from assumptions that full-time teleworkers are less committed to work. Finally, we demonstrate disparate impacts on promotion and earning opportunities based on gender and parenthood, primarily due to differing employer perceptions regarding work performance and commitment.

Women and the Standard Workweek: Developing a Typology of Work Schedules in the UK

Jennifer Whillans

When do women work? Which women work when? Much of our understanding of the temporal organisation of women’s paid work relies on oversimplified stylised estimates of duration and categorical indicators of work timing. Using United Kingdom Time Use Survey 2014–2015 workweek grid data and innovative sequence analysis, this research provides new empirical evidence by identifying a typology of women’s work schedules, including variants of and departures from the standard workweek. Furthermore, sociodemographic and job characteristics are found to be associated with different work schedules. A feminist evaluation of findings highlights the insufficiency of the standard/nonstandard dichotomy and presents new ways of describing worktime that better capture the complex and diverse experiences of women. It concludes that, while the standard workweek is not strictly identifiable as a type of schedule, it acts as an organising principle of worktime among contemporary working women.

Beyond the ‘Gig Economy’: Towards Variable Experiences of Job Quality in Platform Work

Alex J Wood, Nicholas Martindale, Brendan J Burchell

The ‘gig economy’ encompasses a wide range of jobs, platforms and workers. In this article, we provide the first quantitative evidence in support of the model of job quality developed by Wood et al. that predicts divergence across local and remote platform work. Specifically, we find that remote platform work entails significantly better pay, more flexibility, greater influence over how to do the job, a greater sense of doing useful work, better health and safety, less pain, and less work-related insecurity. In contrast, local platform work entails greater organisational influence and less physical isolation. We explain these disparities by considering how divergent organisational forms emerge across the local/remote divide as a result of specific differences in platform technologies and worker skills.

Coercion and Consent under Techno-Economic Despotism: Workers’ Alienation and ‘Liberation’ in the Amazon Warehouse

Mi?osz Miszczyński, Patrizia Zanoni

This article explores the role of subjectivity in workers’ control in warehouses. Relying on Marx’s theory of the alienated subject under capitalism, we analyse the narratives of Polish Amazon workers to understand how alienating work produces a contradictory consenting subject. Workers are both estranged from the labour process, commodities, social relations and themselves, and simultaneously reconstituted as agents with new potentialities. Reflecting Marx’s ‘civilising’ dimension of capitalism, they are reconstituted as sellers of labour, consumers, individuals deserving respect and holders of legal rights. This transformation elicits workers’ consent to alienating work conditions because these new possibilities depend on such conditions. Our study advances discussions of control in global warehousing by highlighting how workers’ consent operates alongside coercion. It also advances our understanding of consent by showing that it is not merely a coping mechanism for meaningless work but rather emerges from workers’ integration into capitalist relations.

Gender Ideologies and Workplace Diversity Policies: Are Voluntary Women’s Quotas and Mentoring Programmes Associated with Employees’ Gender Ideologies?

Eileen Peters, Anja-Kristin Abendroth

Following policy feedback theory, this article argues that normative policy feedback mechanisms also operate at the workplace level, where employees are expected to adapt their beliefs to the specific policy context in which they are embedded. Specifically, it considers employees’ gender ideologies and their association with two prominent workplace-level diversity policies: voluntary women’s quotas and mentoring programmes. Partial proportional odds models are estimated employing a unique German linked employer–employee dataset (2018/19) incorporating 2445 employees and 82 workplaces. Findings indicate that voluntary women’s quotas implemented in workplaces are associated with more egalitarian gender ideologies among employees. This clear pattern was not detected for mentoring programmes. No gender differences were discovered, suggesting that normative policy feedback effects in the workplace are present equally among women and men. In conclusion, the findings indicate that policy feedback mechanisms operate not only at the national but also at the workplace level.

Young is Fun: Examining the Inter-Relations of Play and Age at Work

Cara Reed, Helen C Williams, Katrina Pritchard

This article addresses current limitations in theorisations of fun, introducing Turner’s liminoid/liminal distinction of play and work. This suggests engaging in play – liminoid phenomena – releases individuals from everyday societal structures, like age-based identity memberships. Featuring participant data from a large UK-based insurance firm, the research highlights how play activities are underpinned by age-related assumptions. The study makes three contributions. First, conceptualising the ‘pseudo-liminoid’ – a space between work and play where the potential for play to be freeing is curtailed. Second, it problematises common positive attributes of organisational play, suggesting play can reproduce social norms, thus undermining why it was introduced to the organisation. Finally, it highlights how play and fun can be ‘a(chǎn)ged’, with implications for how organisations conceive of play’s role in creating an inclusive workplace.

‘Lived Capitalisation’: How Speculative Finance Shapes the Social and Financial Lives of ‘Gig’ Workers in Bengaluru, India

Kaveri Medappa

This article examines how speculative investments in platform businesses generate acute financial risks and the threat of downward social mobility for platform-based cab drivers and food delivery workers in Bengaluru, India. Informed by ethnographic research, this article departs from predominant understandings of platform workers’ experiences at ‘the point of production’ and investigates ‘gig’ workers’ social and financial lives as mediated by platform capital. The concept of ‘lived capitalisation’ demonstrates how debt-fuelled platform business models produce worker dependency on platforms, drive workers to make unsustainable financial and social investments and result in income declines for workers, thus adversely impacting the social reproduction of worker households. This concept foregrounds the concrete – and gendered – effects of financialised business models that deepen workers’ dependence on debt, financial products and subjectivities to sustain everyday social reproduction. This article also advances understandings of ‘capitalisation’ and ‘a(chǎn)ssetisation’ by centring workers’ experiences of these financial logics.

Part 3

On the Front Line

Change and Resistance in the Royal Mail: Dispatches from the 2022/2023 Postal Workers’ Strike

Daniel Evans, Karl Jones

This article presents the experiences of ‘Karl’, a veteran postal worker and trade union organiser. Karl’s story outlines the impact of the myriad changes that have happened to the postal service and to the working life of postal workers since the privatisation of the Royal Mail in 2013. Karl highlights how new technologies – typically associated with the ‘gig economy’ – have permeated a formerly ‘low tech’, ‘traditional’ sector and have been used to intensify the labour process and discipline the workforce. Karl outlines the profound impact these changes have had on the postal workforce: eroding their autonomy, destroying their ‘leisure in work’ and affecting their physical and mental health. Karl’s story also demonstrates the persistence of the ‘public service ethos’ in the Royal Mail despite privatisation. Workers argued that the ‘modernisation’ of the postal service had in fact led to the neglect of the universal mail service and the attendant erosion of the historic community function and status of the postal worker.

Misclassification, Tipping and the Responsibilisation of Work in the Global South

Simon Pek, Paulina Segarra, Ernesto Rodriguez, Ajnesh Prasad

Workers are increasingly expected to take on responsibilities for those aspects of their wellbeing that were historically attended to by their employers – an unsettling trend that has been termed ‘responsibilisation’. While this phenomenon is manifesting across the globe and poses significant implications for both employers and employees, the effects of responsibilisation are perhaps most detrimentally felt by workers in the Global South, where there are relatively less robust systems of social welfare and fewer institutional protections available compared with the Global North. Two understudied mechanisms through which businesses enable responsibilisation are misclassification and tipping. Drawing on Ernesto’s reflexive narrative as a cerillo – a worker who bags groceries on a ‘voluntary’ basis for customers in a Mexico City supermarket – this article explores how businesses exploit these mechanisms for the purpose of absolving themselves of the responsibilities that they would otherwise have towards those classified as employees. Most troublingly, businesses achieve this absolution while, at the same time, exerting the type of organisational control over cerillos’ working lives that would be typically reflected in a contractual employer–employee relationship.

Part 4

Book Review

Book Review: Alan Middleton, The Informal Sector in Ecuador: Artisans, Entrepreneurs and Precarious Family Firms

Bishnuprasad Mohapatra

Book Review: Roland Erne, Sabina Stan, Darragh Golden, Imre Szabó and Vincenzo Maccarrone, Politicising Commodification: European Governance and Labour Politics from the Financial Crisis to the Covid Emergency

Ian Greer

Part 5

Obituary

Theo Nichols: A Personal Tribute

Peter Armstrong

以上就是本期外刊吃瓜的全部?jī)?nèi)容啦！

期刊/趣文/熱點(diǎn)/漫談

學(xué)術(shù)路上，

JCS陪你一起成長(zhǎng)！

關(guān)于 JCS

《中國(guó)社會(huì)學(xué)學(xué)刊》（The Journal of Chinese Sociology）于2014年10月由中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院社會(huì)學(xué)研究所創(chuàng)辦。作為中國(guó)大陸第一本英文社會(huì)學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)期刊，JCS致力于為中國(guó)社會(huì)學(xué)者與國(guó)外同行的學(xué)術(shù)交流和合作打造國(guó)際一流的學(xué)術(shù)平臺(tái)。JCS由全球最大科技期刊出版集團(tuán)施普林格·自然(Springer Nature)出版發(fā)行，由國(guó)內(nèi)外頂尖社會(huì)學(xué)家組成強(qiáng)大編委會(huì)隊(duì)伍，采用雙向匿名評(píng)審方式和“開(kāi)放獲取”(open access)出版模式。JCS已于2021年5月被ESCI收錄。2022年，JCS的CiteScore分值為2.0（Q2），在社科類(lèi)別的262種期刊中排名第94位，位列同類(lèi)期刊前36%。2023年，JCS在科睿唯安發(fā)布的2023年度《期刊引證報(bào)告》（JCR）中首次獲得影響因子并達(dá)到1.5（Q3）。2025年JCS最新影響因子1.3，位列社會(huì)學(xué)領(lǐng)域期刊全球前53%（Q3）。

▉ 歡迎向《中國(guó)社會(huì)學(xué)學(xué)刊》投稿!!

Please consider submitting to

The Journal of Chinese Sociology!

▉ 官方網(wǎng)站：

https://journalofchinesesociology.springeropen.com