近日，教育博主“一五老師”發(fā)文對上海古籍出版社出版的《西廂記》一書提出批評，稱發(fā)現(xiàn)多處錯誤。

12月7日，上海古籍出版社就《西廂記》一書編校質(zhì)量問題，發(fā)布情況通報(bào)稱，已“通知經(jīng)銷商全面下架該書”，“并向廣大讀者表示誠摯的歉意”。

A Chinese education blogger's public criticism has led to a major publisher recalling and apologizing for a classic literary work due to numerous editorial errors.

情況通報(bào)如下：

12月2日晚，有讀者在網(wǎng)絡(luò)平臺對上海古籍出版社出版的《西廂記》一書提出批評，稱發(fā)現(xiàn)多處錯誤。上海古籍出版社第一時(shí)間啟動圖書質(zhì)量檢查程序。12月3日，我社即通知經(jīng)銷商全面下架該書。12月4日，完成該書的質(zhì)檢報(bào)告，確認(rèn)該書存在編校質(zhì)量問題。對此，我們深感愧疚，并向廣大讀者表示誠摯的歉意。

12月5日，上海古籍出版社負(fù)責(zé)人專程赴京聯(lián)系該讀者，希望能夠當(dāng)面聽取意見建議，但因該讀者表示工作繁忙而未能當(dāng)面溝通。我社負(fù)責(zé)人通過短信向其反饋了初步處理情況，并對該讀者提出的批評指正表達(dá)了衷心感謝。

12月6日，上海古籍出版社召開圖書質(zhì)量工作專題會議，就《西廂記》一書中暴露出的內(nèi)部管理問題和質(zhì)量把關(guān)問題，進(jìn)行深刻反思并研究整改措施；要求全社上下吸取教訓(xùn)、舉一反三，強(qiáng)調(diào)要始終把編校質(zhì)量作為出版社的生命線。

Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House announced on Sunday that it had initiated a quality check immediately after being alerted. The publisher said it ordered all distributors to remove the book from shelves on Wednesday and completed a quality assessment report on Thursday, confirming the existence of editorial problems.

The publisher also revealed that on Friday, a senior representative traveled to Beijing, hoping to meet the blogger in person, but was unable to do so as the blogger cited a busy schedule. Feedback and gratitude were instead conveyed via text message.

An internal meeting was held on Saturday to reflect on the management and quality control issues exposed by this case and to formulate corrective measures. The publisher emphasized it would "learn its lesson" and reaffirmed that editorial quality is its "lifeline".

近日，教育博主“一五老師”發(fā)推文和視頻稱，上海古籍出版社出版的“國學(xué)典藏”系列的《西廂記》一書當(dāng)中，存在多處錯誤?！拔抑淮致钥戳艘槐?，就發(fā)現(xiàn)了300多個各種各樣千奇百怪的錯誤。”這位博主在12月2日的推文當(dāng)中表示。

The incident began on Dec 2 when the blogger, known online as "Teacher Yiwu", posted on social media claiming to have found over 300 errors in a version of

The Romance of the West Chamber

教育博主“一五老師”標(biāo)注出前言中的錯誤

12月2日，上海古籍出版社在這位博主的視頻評論區(qū)回應(yīng)稱：“尊敬的讀者您好，我們已關(guān)注到您對我社國學(xué)典藏版《西廂記》前言諸疑誤的批評。這些問題將反饋給編輯部門，予以核實(shí)，并對該書作進(jìn)一步檢查。感謝您對我社的關(guān)注，您的指正將會幫助我們進(jìn)步?！?/p>

上海古籍出版社在“一五老師”的視頻評論區(qū)回應(yīng)

“一五老師”對此在視頻評論區(qū)進(jìn)行了回復(fù)，并表示，他個人對出版社的回復(fù)并不滿意：“看來您還沒意識翻這本書的質(zhì)量問題的嚴(yán)重性。我這個視頻只說了前言是因?yàn)槿珪e誤實(shí)在太多了，一個視頻根本說不完。我粗讀一遍就找出了300多處，正文問題比前言更多?！?/p>

“一五老師”稱，除了《西廂記》這本書的前言部分，在序言當(dāng)中，短短300多字，竟然出現(xiàn)了12處錯誤，有些還是嚴(yán)重的、致命的錯誤。

In his posts and videos, the blogger detailed mistakes in the preface, introduction, and main text, calling some errors "severe and fatal". He stated that in one 300-word preface alone, he identified 12 issues.

“一五老師”標(biāo)注出序言中的不少錯誤

12月5日，“一五老師”在繼續(xù)糾錯《西廂記》的同時(shí)，又指出了另一本出版物存在編校錯誤，“‘語文課推薦閱讀叢書’之《世說新語》，短短兩本100多頁的小冊子，至少有30多處錯誤！”

12月6日，中華書局回應(yīng)并向各經(jīng)銷商發(fā)布了下架通知。

This is not the only publication "Teacher Yiwu" has recently criticized. On Friday, he pointed out alleged errors in another publication,

A New Account of the Tales of the World

On Saturday, its publisher, Zhonghua Book Company, also issued a recall notice.

“一五老師”的連續(xù)糾錯行為引發(fā)網(wǎng)友熱議，有不少網(wǎng)友表示支持，認(rèn)為出版圖書有如此多的錯誤實(shí)在不應(yīng)該，有損出版社的信譽(yù)，為博主較真的態(tài)度點(diǎn)贊，也為當(dāng)前出版社編校質(zhì)量下降感到擔(dān)憂。

The blogger's actions have sparked online debate. Many netizens support his meticulous approach, arguing that such a high error rate in published books is unacceptable and damages publisher's credibility. They express concern over declining editorial standards.

也有網(wǎng)友認(rèn)為當(dāng)代學(xué)者與古代學(xué)人的知識范圍存在不對稱，古籍整理難度大，不能對編輯過于苛責(zé)，一味指責(zé)難以推動問題實(shí)質(zhì)性解決。

一名圖書編輯行業(yè)從業(yè)者表示，現(xiàn)在出版社對突出質(zhì)量把控其實(shí)還是很嚴(yán)格的，對圖書質(zhì)量不滿向出版社投訴、反饋，提出修改意見，出版社都是歡迎的，讀者糾錯促進(jìn)圖書行業(yè)提升質(zhì)量是好事，但編輯的錯誤是永遠(yuǎn)無法徹底地消除的，其個人擔(dān)心可能會出現(xiàn)部分心懷不軌者專門挑起事端獲取流量，放大了編校差錯問題和讀者對于圖書質(zhì)量的焦慮。

Others, however, urge understanding, noting the significant challenge of annotating ancient texts for modern readers and the difficulty in completely eliminating errors. Some within the publishing industry worry that while reader feedback is valuable for improving quality, excessive focus on minor flaws could be exploited for sensationalism and unnecessarily heighten public anxiety about book quality.

來源：新聞晨報(bào) 揚(yáng)子晚報(bào) 新京報(bào) 中國新聞周刊

跟著China Daily

精讀英語新聞

“無痛”學(xué)英語，每天20分鐘就夠！